TY - JOUR
T1 - Technical and regulatory challenges in artificial intelligence-based pulse oximetry
T2 - a proposed development pipeline
AU - Cabanas, Ana M.
AU - Martín-Escudero, Pilar
AU - Pagán, Josué
AU - Mery, Domingo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Pulse oximetry, although generally effective under ideal conditions, faces challenges in accurately estimating peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in complex clinical scenarios, particularly at lower saturation levels and in patients with darker skin pigmentation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to improve SpO2 monitoring by enabling more accurate, equitable, and accessible estimations. We highlight key challenges in developing AI-enhanced pulse oximetry, including the need for diverse and representative datasets, refined validation protocols addressing ethical concerns such as algorithmic bias, expanded SpO2 measurement ranges encompassing hypoxaemic levels, and enhanced model interpretability. We emphasise the importance of transitioning from subjective skin tone assessments to quantitative methods to ensure equity and mitigate bias. Finally, we propose a development pipeline and discuss strategies for robust, fair AI-based SpO2 monitoring, including aligning validation with global regulatory frameworks and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. These advances will improve the reliability and fairness of pulse oximetry, ultimately contributing to enhanced global patient care.
AB - Pulse oximetry, although generally effective under ideal conditions, faces challenges in accurately estimating peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in complex clinical scenarios, particularly at lower saturation levels and in patients with darker skin pigmentation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to improve SpO2 monitoring by enabling more accurate, equitable, and accessible estimations. We highlight key challenges in developing AI-enhanced pulse oximetry, including the need for diverse and representative datasets, refined validation protocols addressing ethical concerns such as algorithmic bias, expanded SpO2 measurement ranges encompassing hypoxaemic levels, and enhanced model interpretability. We emphasise the importance of transitioning from subjective skin tone assessments to quantitative methods to ensure equity and mitigate bias. Finally, we propose a development pipeline and discuss strategies for robust, fair AI-based SpO2 monitoring, including aligning validation with global regulatory frameworks and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. These advances will improve the reliability and fairness of pulse oximetry, ultimately contributing to enhanced global patient care.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - bias
KW - haemoglobin oxygen saturation
KW - pulse oximetry
KW - regulation
KW - skin pigmentation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000043497
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.014
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.014
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 40089400
AN - SCOPUS:105000043497
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 134
SP - 1295
EP - 1299
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -