TY - JOUR
T1 - Sistema de Gestión de Resultados Investigativos en Universidades Chilenas
AU - Suárez-Amaya, Wendolin
AU - Ganga-Contreras, Francisco
AU - Torres-Luque, Pablo Esteban
AU - Alarcón, Nancy
AU - Castillo, Juan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, HISIN (History of Information Systems). All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/1/2
Y1 - 2025/1/2
N2 - Introduction: Research management in universities refers to the policies, strategies, and practices aimed at administering, fostering, and leveraging the research outputs of these entities. This study seeks to conduct a comparative analysis of the research output management system in three state universities in Chile to identify best practices that can be replicated in similar institutions. Methodology: This qualitative research is based on a literature review and content analysis of information available on the websites of three selected universities. The criteria for comparison and analysis are established by the National Accreditation Commission (CNA) of Chile: research policies, promotion strategies and actions, and performance indicators. Results: The three universities share the objective of promoting academic excellence and social and scientific development, but they adopt different approaches. This is reflected in the analysis of each element of the research output management system. Concurrently, this study highlights both collective best practices and notable actions unique to each analyzed institution. Conclusions: In all cases, there are strengths in research management that can serve as models to be replicated in other universities.
AB - Introduction: Research management in universities refers to the policies, strategies, and practices aimed at administering, fostering, and leveraging the research outputs of these entities. This study seeks to conduct a comparative analysis of the research output management system in three state universities in Chile to identify best practices that can be replicated in similar institutions. Methodology: This qualitative research is based on a literature review and content analysis of information available on the websites of three selected universities. The criteria for comparison and analysis are established by the National Accreditation Commission (CNA) of Chile: research policies, promotion strategies and actions, and performance indicators. Results: The three universities share the objective of promoting academic excellence and social and scientific development, but they adopt different approaches. This is reflected in the analysis of each element of the research output management system. Concurrently, this study highlights both collective best practices and notable actions unique to each analyzed institution. Conclusions: In all cases, there are strengths in research management that can serve as models to be replicated in other universities.
KW - Chilean universities
KW - public management
KW - research management
KW - research outcomes
KW - research policies
KW - research practices
KW - strategies
KW - university governance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85218773450
U2 - 10.31637/epsir-2025-1680
DO - 10.31637/epsir-2025-1680
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218773450
SN - 2529-9824
VL - 10
JO - European Public and Social Innovation Review
JF - European Public and Social Innovation Review
ER -