Excepciones a derechos

Marcos Andrade Moreno

doi:10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166

Excepciones a derechos

Marcos Andrade Moreno

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

El artículo presenta dos sentidos de excepciones a derechos y las razones por las que conviene distinguirlos. Se muestran las dificultades teóricas de definir el concepto de excepción y cancelación o suspensión de derechos, ya que ellos, al parecer, descansan en la idea de anormalidad. Se muestran las dificultades de este enfoque y su justificación en el debate en torno a las excepciones implícitas y la derrotabilidad. Se ofrece una manera de superar estas dificultades, abandonando el enfoque lógico. En su lugar, se presenta un enfoque funcional que busca co-definir las excepciones y las suspensiones o cancelaciones mediante sus relaciones con otras normas denominadas normas alterativas, cuyo fin sería alcanzar cierto gran de flexibilidad normativa.

Título traducido de la contribución	Exceptions to rights
Idioma original	Español
Páginas (desde-hasta)	226-243
Número de páginas	18
Publicación	EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad
N.º	14
DOI	https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166
Estado	Publicada - 19 mar. 2018
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Palabras clave

Excepciones
Cancelaciones
Normas que establecen derechos
Flexibilidad normativa

Acceder al documento

10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166Licencia: CC BY-NC-ND

Citar esto

@article{788c74245ba6412490002d50e3d7c334,

title = "Excepciones a derechos",

abstract = "This article presents two senses of exceptions to rights and the reasons why it is important to distinguish between them. It demonstrates the theoretical difficulties in defining the concept of exception and the cancellation or suspension of rights, since these concepts appear to rest on the idea of abnormality. The article highlights the shortcomings of this approach and its justification within the debate surrounding implied exceptions and defeasibility. It offers a way to overcome these difficulties by abandoning the logical approach. Instead, it presents a functional approach that seeks to co-define exceptions and suspensions or cancellations through their relationships with other norms called alternative norms, the aim of which would be to achieve a degree of normative flexibility.",

keywords = "Excepciones, Cancelaciones, Normas que establecen derechos, Flexibilidad normativa, Exceptions, Derogations, Enacted rights, Normative flexibility",

author = "Moreno, \{Marcos Andrade\}",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "19",

doi = "10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166",

language = "Spanish",

pages = "226--243",

journal = "EUNOM{\'I}A. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad",

issn = "2253-6655",

number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Excepciones a derechos

AU - Moreno, Marcos Andrade

PY - 2018/3/19

Y1 - 2018/3/19

N2 - This article presents two senses of exceptions to rights and the reasons why it is important to distinguish between them. It demonstrates the theoretical difficulties in defining the concept of exception and the cancellation or suspension of rights, since these concepts appear to rest on the idea of abnormality. The article highlights the shortcomings of this approach and its justification within the debate surrounding implied exceptions and defeasibility. It offers a way to overcome these difficulties by abandoning the logical approach. Instead, it presents a functional approach that seeks to co-define exceptions and suspensions or cancellations through their relationships with other norms called alternative norms, the aim of which would be to achieve a degree of normative flexibility.

AB - This article presents two senses of exceptions to rights and the reasons why it is important to distinguish between them. It demonstrates the theoretical difficulties in defining the concept of exception and the cancellation or suspension of rights, since these concepts appear to rest on the idea of abnormality. The article highlights the shortcomings of this approach and its justification within the debate surrounding implied exceptions and defeasibility. It offers a way to overcome these difficulties by abandoning the logical approach. Instead, it presents a functional approach that seeks to co-define exceptions and suspensions or cancellations through their relationships with other norms called alternative norms, the aim of which would be to achieve a degree of normative flexibility.

KW - Excepciones

KW - Cancelaciones

KW - Normas que establecen derechos

KW - Flexibilidad normativa

KW - Exceptions

KW - Derogations

KW - Enacted rights

KW - Normative flexibility

U2 - 10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166

DO - 10.20318/eunomia.2018.4166

M3 - Article

SN - 2253-6655

SP - 226

EP - 243

JO - EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad

JF - EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad

IS - 14

ER -

Excepciones a derechos

Resumen

Palabras clave

Acceder al documento

Huella

Citar esto