TY - JOUR
T1 - Access to higher education in Chile
T2 - A public vs. private analysis
AU - Espinoza, Oscar
AU - González, Luis Eduardo
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - This study analyzes how access to public and private institutions of higher education in Chile has changed as the post-secondary system has become increasingly privatized. It analyses access by young people to higher education from four perspectives: funding type (public/private), gender, family income level, and ethnicity. The study uses descriptive data, primarily from the CASEN and Higher Education Information System (SIES) databases. Access to higher education in Chile has exploded in recent decades, largely because of private institutions, which currently enrol two thirds of higher education students, and offer them courses that are often irrelevant and of low quality. In contrast, in the early 1980s, the private sector enrolled under 30% of students. The study also found a gradual increase in the enrolment of females, of students from the least wealthy families, and of ethnic minorities, although the inequality gap persists, especially at the more prestigious private and public universities.
AB - This study analyzes how access to public and private institutions of higher education in Chile has changed as the post-secondary system has become increasingly privatized. It analyses access by young people to higher education from four perspectives: funding type (public/private), gender, family income level, and ethnicity. The study uses descriptive data, primarily from the CASEN and Higher Education Information System (SIES) databases. Access to higher education in Chile has exploded in recent decades, largely because of private institutions, which currently enrol two thirds of higher education students, and offer them courses that are often irrelevant and of low quality. In contrast, in the early 1980s, the private sector enrolled under 30% of students. The study also found a gradual increase in the enrolment of females, of students from the least wealthy families, and of ethnic minorities, although the inequality gap persists, especially at the more prestigious private and public universities.
KW - Access to education
KW - Chile
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Gender
KW - Income level
KW - Privatization of education
KW - Public and private higher education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84879283915
U2 - 10.1007/s11125-013-9268-8
DO - 10.1007/s11125-013-9268-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84879283915
SN - 0033-1538
VL - 43
SP - 199
EP - 214
JO - Prospects
JF - Prospects
IS - 2
ER -