Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trauma in the preceramic coastal populations of northern Chile: Violence or occupational hazards?

  • Universidad de Tarapacá
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

One hundred and forty-four Chinchorro skeletons, stored at the Museo Arqueologico San Miguel de Azapa in Atica, Chile, were examined to test the following alternative hypotheses concerning skeletal trauma: either observed trauma was a consequence of interpersonal violence, or was the result of work-related accidents. Trauma found in subadults was rare, with 1.8% (1/55) contrasted with 30% (27/89) in the adult population. The location of most adult trauma was the skull with 24.6% (17/69), followed by the upper extremities with 8.7% (7/80), the trunk with 2.9% (2/68), and the lower extremities with the least trauma at 1.1% (1/89). Skull trauma corresponded to well-healed, semicircular fractures, with males being three times more affected than females at 34.2% (13/38) and 12.9% (4/31), respectively. Most fractures were nonlethal, appearing to have been caused by impacts from stones, suggesting interpersonal violence rather than accidents. This study indicates that the egalitarian, maritime, hunter-gatherer Chinchorro culture (circa 4000 years B.P.) may not have lived as peacefully as once thought. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-249
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume112
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2000

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Chinchorro
  • Coastal bioarchaeology
  • Fractures
  • Interpersonal violence
  • Warfare

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trauma in the preceramic coastal populations of northern Chile: Violence or occupational hazards?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this