Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Qualitative Inquiry in the Neoliberal Public Sphere: Contesting Accountability Metrics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Based on a critical and constructive dialogue that I articulate drawing from different authors concerned about the differentiated value that is given to academic publications at present, I reflect from the standpoint of a particular Latin American context on how we can meet the demands of governments regarding education and science, contributing to the development of our universities while complying with international and local quality standards, but without losing the sense of an academic career project aimed at generating knowledge in social sciences that can be put at the service of communities that are researched and contribute to the improvement of people’s lives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1246-1249
Number of pages4
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume27
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • academic role
  • boundaries and research
  • contradictions
  • metrics
  • neoliberalism
  • qualitative research
  • sense of research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Qualitative Inquiry in the Neoliberal Public Sphere: Contesting Accountability Metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this