Projects per year
Abstract
This article analyses the applicability of the indirect perpetration model as a basis for personal attribution to natural persons who employ AI-powered devices’ technical capabilities, and it adopts a favourable stance. In this analysis, the article introduces, as an initial conceptual approach, the category of “actants” (comprising such devices). This challenges the modern criminal law’s bipartite conceptual framework, which solely distinguishes between “subjects” and “objects.” It is proposed that this category of actants may serve as an effective instrument for reinterpreting criminal law structures when addressing the issue of criminal liability arising from the involvement of intelligent machines.
| Translated title of the contribution | Artificial Intelligence as an “actant” in Criminal Law. An initial approach |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish (Chile) |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política |
| Issue number | 43 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Criminal liability
- Indirect perpetration
- Criminal participation
- Intelligent agents
- Actants
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial Intelligence as an “actant” in Criminal Law. An initial approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver