Abstract
Objective: This article analyzes the implementation of the non-punishment principle (PNP) in the 2ormo f2f2 trafficking in persons, with particular attention to its normative variations and the challenges affecting its effectiveness. It examines how this principle seeks to avoid the double victimization of exploited persons who are punished for unlawful activities stemming from their victim status. Method: A comparative approach and a doctrinal 2ormo f2 of national and international regulations are employed to identify the legal models adopted in the implementation of the PNP. In addition, the difficulties that impede its uniform and effective implementation are analyzed. Results: The study evidences substantial differences in the formulation and application of the PNP among different legislations, which affects its consistency at the international level. Obstacles are identified such as the lack of uniformity in its recognition, the absence of clear implementation mechanisms and the need for a more solid regulatory framework for its guarantee. Conclusions: The PNP faces important challenges for its consolidation in international law. It is necessary to strengthen its application through normative harmonization to ensure effective and uniform protection for victims of trafficking in persons.
| Translated title of the contribution | The principle of non-punishment of victims of trafficking in persons.: A comparative law approach |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 203-227 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Revista Juridica |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 82 |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- Comparative law
- International migration law
- Non-punishment principle
- Trafficking in persons
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The principle of non-punishment of victims of trafficking in persons. A comparative law approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver