Abstract
The relation between individual and society has been a main topic across the history of social sciences. The aim of this paper is to show the originality of Sigmund Freud's ideas about the topic, through a comparative analysis with the approaches of the socio-anthropological currents of the school of Culture and Personality (Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict, Ralph Linton) and of French Sociology (Emile Durkheim, Marcel Mauss and Claude Lévi-Strauss). Our research was based on a bibliographical analysis of some key socio-anthropological texts on this debate, as well as the relevant Freudian production. The interpretation of the Freudian material was organized according to three topics: a) the affirmation of the symbolic determination of symptoms, b) the methodological erasure of the individual society distinction, and c) the theorization of a mythical, transindividual and transhistorical efficacy. We conclude by emphasizing the contributions of Freud's thought to the discussion: the affirmation of symbolic determination offers the conditions for overcoming the externality relation between the pole of the individual and that of society, and the consequent rejection of a specular relationship between the two.
| Translated title of the contribution | From the unconscious to the symbolic function: The originality of Freud's contribution to the individual-society debate |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 155-169 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Cinta de Moebio |
| Volume | 62 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From the unconscious to the symbolic function: The originality of Freud's contribution to the individual-society debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver