Projects per year
Abstract
This paper examines the gaps in criminal responsibility arising from situations involving machines that have been endowed with artificial intelligence (AI). Taking into consideration the requirements stemming from the principle of criminal legality, the fragmentary nature of criminal law, and the imperatives of human dignity, this study adopts a restrictive approach to the concept of a “responsibility gap,” setting it apart from other instances of non-liability. Starting from the premise that intelligent artificial entities are not subject to criminal liability by legislative decision, it is argued that such a gap emerges when the perpetration of a legally relevant act results from the interaction between two agents: one that can indeed be held criminally accountable (such as a natural person or a corporate entity) and an intelligent artificial entity, yet no liability can be imposed on the former due to a technical characteristic inherent in the intelligent machine’s technological configuration.
| Translated title of the contribution | Gaps in criminal liability arising from machines equipped with artificial intelligence |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish (Chile) |
| Article number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 77-107 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Politica Criminal |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 40 |
| Early online date | Sep 2025 |
| State | Published - Dec 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence
- Intelligent entities
- Criminal liability
- Liability gap
- Responsibility gap
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gaps in criminal liability arising from machines equipped with artificial intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver