Abstract
The use of dermatoglyphic traits to describe interpopulational diversity among human populations at various levels of differentiation is compared with similar analysis of gene frequency data by means of nonparametric methods employing distance matrices and dendrograms, and by a partition of total variability into its between and within population components. Congruence of dermatoglyphics and gene markers appears to vary with level of population differentiation — the association remains insignificant until racial level of differentiation is considered. Different pitfalls of the data used are mentioned. The interpretation of these findings is discussed by comparison with other non‐human studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-59 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Physical Anthropology |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1977 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Blood groups
- Dermatoglyphics
- Genetic distance
- Interpopulational diversity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A collation of marker gene and dermatoglyphic diversity at various levels of population differentiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver